Bibliography

Botterill, G. and Carruthers, P. (1999).

The Philosophy of Psychology.
Cambridge University Press.

Cartwright, N. (1995).

False idealization: A philosophical thrust to scientific method.
Philosophical Studies, 77:339-60.

Chalmers, D. (1996).

The Conscious Mind.
OUP.

Chomsky, N. (1980).

Rules and Representations.
Blackwell.

Chomsky, N. (1986).

Knowledge of Language.
Praeger.

Churchland, P. (1979).

Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind.
Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. M. (1988).

Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality.
Philosophy of Science, 55:167-87.

Davies, M. K. (1989).

Tacit knowledge and subdoxastic states.
In George (1989).

Davies, M. K. (1991).

Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought.
In Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Garon, J., editors, Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Erlbaum.

Davies, M. K. (1994).

The mental simulation debate.
In Lycan, W. G., editor, Mind and Cognition. Blackwell.

Davies, M. K. and Stone, T., editors (1995).

Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate.
Blackwell.

Dennett, D. (1971).

Intentional systems.
Journal of Philosophy, 68.
Available online via JStore.

Evans, M. G. J. (1981).

Semantic theory and tacit knowledge.
In Collected Papers. Clarendon Press.

Fodor, J. (1989).

Why should the mind be modular?
In George (1989).

Friedman, M. (1974).

Explanation and scientific understanding.
Journal of Philosophy, 71:507-31.
Available online via JStore.

George, A., editor (1989).

Reflections on Chomsky.
Blackwell.

Gordon, R. M. (1986).

Folk psychology as simulation.
In Davies and Stone (1995).

Hanson, N. R. (1958).

Patterns of Discovery.
CUP.

Harris, P. L. (1992).

From simulation to folk psychology.
In Davies and Stone (1995).

Heal, J. (1986).

Replication and functionalism.
In Davies and Stone (1995).

Hempel, C. (1965).

Aspects of Scientific Explanation.
Clarendon Press.

Jackson, F. (1986).

What Mary didn't know.
Journal of Philosophy, 83:291-5.
Available online via JStore.

Jeffrey, R. C. (1985).

Probability and the art of judgment.
In Probability and the art of judgment. CUP.

Koyre, A. (1968).

Galileo's treatise De Motu: The use and abuse of imaginary experiment.
In Metaphysics and Measurement. Chapman & Hall.

Kuhn, T. (1977).

A function for thought experiments.
In The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. (1998).

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
University of Chicago Press.

Lewis, D. K. (1979a).

Causal explanation.
In Lewis (1986).

Lewis, D. K. (1979b).

A subjectivist guide to objective chance.
In Lewis (1986).

Lewis, D. K. (1986).

Philosophical papers, volume 2.
OUP.

McGinn, C. (1989).

Can we solve the mind-body problem?
Mind, 98:349-66.
Available online via JStore.

Nagel, T. (1974).

What is it like to be a bat?
Philosophical Review, 83:435-50.
Available online via JStore.

Peacocke, C. A. B. (1989).

When is a grammar psychologically real?
In George (1989).

Quine, W. V. O. (1960).

Word and Object.
The MIT Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1972).

Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory.
In Davidson, D. and Harman, G., editors, Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht Reidel.

Quine, W. V. O. (1993).

In praise of observation sentences.
Journal of Philosophy, 90:107-16.
Available online via JStore.

Ramsey, W., Stich, S., and Garon, J. (1990).

Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology.
Philosophical Perspectives, 4.

Salmon, W. C. (1985).

Rationality and objectivity in science, or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes.
In Papineau, D., editor, The Philosophy of Science. Clarendon Press.

Schlick, M. (1931).

The foundation of knowledge.
In Ayer, A. J., editor, Logical Positivism. Allen & Unwin.

Sørensen, R. A. (1992).

Thought Experiments.
OUP.

Sterelny, K. (1990).

The Representational Theory of Mind.
Blackwell.

Stich, S. and Nichols, S. (1996).

How do minds understand minds?
In Deconstructing the Mind. OUP.

van Fraassen, B. C. (1980).

The Scientific Image.
Clarendon Press.

von Plato, J. (1994).

Creating Modern Probability.
Cambridge University Press.